Assessment of Environmental Impact of Contruction Projects: Asphalt

Authors

  • Hengki Junata Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Ramdan Yusuf Universitas Medako Tolitoli
  • Dewanto Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Wiwid Suryono Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61991/ijeet.v2i2.41

Keywords:

Environmental Impact Assessment, Construction Project, Green Building, Certification

Abstract

The construction industry contributes significantly to environmental degradation. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is becoming an important instrument to minimise the negative impacts of construction projects. Certification and compliance with green building standards are increasingly important to promote sustainable development. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of EIA in minimising the environmental impact of construction projects and to assess the readiness of the construction industry in adopting green building certification and compliance. This research is a type of literature review research related to EIA, green building regulations, and construction project case studies. The results concluded that EIA is effective in identifying and minimising the environmental impacts of construction projects. However, there are several obstacles in its implementation, such as the lack of experts and weak law enforcement. Green building certification and compliance are still not widely adopted by the construction industry in Indonesia. Furthermore, to strengthen the implementation of EIA and improve the readiness of the construction industry in adopting green building certification and compliance. This can be achieved through education, training, and incentives for developers and contractors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agbajor, F. D., & Mewomo, M. C. (2024). Green building research in South Africa : A scoping review and future roadmaps. Energy and Built Environment, 5(2), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2022.11.001

Atasoy, A. T. (2016). Behavioral Responses of Green Builders to Discontinuous Certification Schemes Ayse Tugba Atasoy December 2016 Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN). 18.

Bai, Y., Muralidharan, N., Sun, Y. K., Passerini, S., Whittingham, M. S., &; Belharouak, I. (2020). Energy and Environmental Aspects in Recycling Lithium-ion Batteries : Concept of Battery Identity Global Passport Keywords. 1–41.

Braulio-gonzalo, M., Jorge-ortiz, A., &; Bovea, M. D. (2022). How are indicators in Green Building Rating Systems addressing sustainability dimensions and life cycle frameworks in residential buildings ? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95(April), 106793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106793

Fitriani, H. and A. (2022). Barriers to Sustainable Practices in Indonesian Construction Industry. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–41.

Foster, G. (2020). Resources , Conservation &; Recycling: Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 152(October 2019), 104507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507

Handayani, N. U., &; Engineering, I. (n.d.). Drivers and barriers in the adoption of green supply chain management in construction projects : A case of Indonesia.

Jamoussi, B., Abu-rizaiza, A., &; Al-haij, A. (2022). Sustainable Building Standards , Codes and Certification Systems : The Status Quo and Future Directions in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2022, 12(10314), 1–24.

Kabirifar, K., Mojtahedi, M., Wang, C., Tam, V. W. Y., Management, D. W., Management, D. W., Waste, D., Contributing, M., &; Management, D. W. (2020). A Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce , reuse , and recycle strategies for effective waste management : A Review. 2020, 1–32.

Leiringer, R. (2020). Sustainable Construction through Industry Self-Regulation : The Development and Role of Building Environmental Assessment Methods in Achieving Green Building. Sustainability, 12(8853), 1–16.

Norouzi, N., &; Soori, M. (2020). Energy , environment , water , and land-use nexus based evaluation of the global green building standards. Water-Energy Nexus, 3, 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2020.10.001

Olukoya, O. A. P., &; Atanda, J. O. (2020). Assessing the Social Sustainability Indicators in Vernacular Architecture — Application of a Green Building Assessment Approach. Environments, 7(67), 1–24.

Pamidimukkala, A., &; Kermanshachi, S. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 on field and office workforce in construction industry. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100018

Poon, S. (2021). Deconstructing Sustainability Perceptions: Investigating Technological Innovation-Environmental Interaction in Green Buildings and the Influence of Architectural Design. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 8(1), 91–101.

Pratiwi, D., Muhammad, M., &; Lutfi, M. (2023). IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE SUPERVISION SYSTEM FOR MINE C MINING IN THE BOTTOLAI ENVIRONMENT , COPPO VILLAGE , BARRU REGENCY. 12(2), 1022–1029.

Ramli, F., Ramli, A. M., & Murwadji, T. (n.d.). SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT IN THE ASPECT OF SUB- LAND AND ON-LAND AREA LICENSING UNDER JOB CREATION ACT. 1718–1732. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7376876

Raouf, A. M., &; Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2023). Framework to evaluate quality performance of green building delivery : construction and operational stage. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1858539

Remizov, A., Tukaziban, A., Yelzhanova, Z., Junussova, T., &; Karaca, F. (2021). Adoption of Green Building Assessment Systems to Existing Buildings under Kazakhstani Conditions. Buildings, 11(325), 1–13.

Rozi, F., &; Husin, S. (2022). ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING EFFORTS IN ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT PT JAPFA COMFEED INDONESIA. 685–697.

Sadeghi, M., Naghedi, R., Behzadian, K., &; Shamshirgaran, A. (2022). Customisation of green buildings assessment tools based on climatic zoning and experts judgement using K -means clustering and fuzzy AHP. Building and Environment, 223(May), 109473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109473

Sahid et al. (2020). The Constrains of Green Building Implementation in Indonesia The Constrains of Green Building Implementation in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1485/1/012050

Shen, Y., &; Faure, M. (2021). Green building in China. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09495-3

Willar, D., Varina, E., Waney, Y., Debora, D., &; Pangemanan, G. (2021). Sustainable construction practices in the execution of infrastructure projects The extent of implementation. 10(1), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-07-2019-0086

Yanto, E., &; Syaputra, R. A. (2022). Enrichment : Journal of Management Sustainable Financial Implementation In Supporting The National Economic Recovery Program In The Covid-19 Pandemic . Study On MSME Production Sector In Tolitoli Regency , Central Sulawesi. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 12(4).

Downloads

Published

2024-04-03

How to Cite

Hengki Junata, Ramdan Yusuf, Dewanto, & Wiwid Suryono. (2024). Assessment of Environmental Impact of Contruction Projects: Asphalt. Indonesia Journal of Engineering and Education Technology (IJEET), 2(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.61991/ijeet.v2i2.41

Most read articles by the same author(s)