The Influence of Educational Service Quality on Public Satisfaction

Authors

  • Hikmat Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf
  • Bambang Mardi Sentosa Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf
  • Andri Kurniawan Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf
  • Aries Denta Putra Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf
  • .B Yudi Muhtadi Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61991/ijeet.v4i1.262

Keywords:

Educational Service Quality, Public Satisfaction

Abstract

Educational service quality has become a strategic factor in improving public satisfaction, particularly as educational institutions are increasingly expected to provide accessible, responsive, and high-quality services that meet the evolving needs of stakeholders. Despite various educational reforms, disparities in service quality remain evident in many institutions, affecting users' perceptions and overall satisfaction. This study aims to examine the influence of educational service quality on public satisfaction. The research employed a quantitative explanatory design using a survey approach. Data were collected from service users, including students, parents, and members of the public, through structured questionnaires distributed using proportionate random sampling. Educational service quality was measured using five dimensions adapted from the SERVQUAL model, namely tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy, while public satisfaction was assessed through perceived service performance, expectation fulfillment, overall satisfaction, and willingness to continue using and recommending the services. The collected data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the reliability and validity of the measurement model and to test the proposed structural relationships.The findings reveal that educational service quality has a positive and statistically significant effect on public satisfaction. Improvements in the quality of educational services, particularly in service reliability, responsiveness, and assurance, substantially enhance users' satisfaction and strengthen their trust in educational institutions. Furthermore, high-quality educational services encourage positive perceptions of institutional performance, increase stakeholder loyalty, and foster continuous public engagement in educational development. The study also demonstrates that educational service quality serves as a critical determinant of public satisfaction by bridging institutional performance with stakeholder expectations. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening service quality management through continuous evaluation, staff competency development, user-oriented service innovation, and effective quality assurance systems. This research contributes to the literature on educational management by providing empirical evidence that improving educational service quality is an effective strategy for enhancing public satisfaction and supporting sustainable educational governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x

Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2010). The influence of university image on student behaviour. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011013060

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Cronin, J. J., Jr., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600304

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.

OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

Oliver, R. L. (2015). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Osborne, S. P. (2021). Public service logic: Creating value for public service users, citizens, and society. Routledge.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293070

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Yeo, R. K. (2008). Brewing service quality in higher education: Characteristics of ingredients that make up the recipe. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(3), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810886277

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Hikmat, Bambang Mardi Sentosa, Andri Kurniawan, Aries Denta Putra, & .B Yudi Muhtadi. (2026). The Influence of Educational Service Quality on Public Satisfaction. Indonesia Journal of Engineering and Education Technology (IJEET), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.61991/ijeet.v4i1.262

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)